The Constitutional Court's Purity as a Pillar of the Rule of Law
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: The Constitutional Court has four primary areas of authority as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution, namely, reviewing legislation against the constitution, resolving disputes of authority among state institutions, dissolving political parties, and determining the results of general elections. Although the MK serves as the guardian and enforcer of the constitution, concerns have arisen that it may overstep its authority by acting as a positive legislator, a role that should be reserved for the legislative and executive branches. The importance of the separation of powers and a system of checks and balances is emphasized to prevent the MK from making unconstitutional decisions. Furthermore, the constitution should be understood as a living law within society, capable of evolving alongside social and political developments. Thus, the MK must adhere to its established authority to avoid disrupting the legal order and justice in Indonesia. This article aims to provide insight into the challenges faced by the MK in preserving the purity and integrity of Indonesia's legal system.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agu, Sunny Nzie. 2024. “Separation of Powers in Baron de Montesquieu: Philosophical Appraisal.” Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology 2, no. 1 (January): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i1.7101.
Alam, Afreen Afshar. 2024. “The Theory of Checks and Balances.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4712245.
Alder, John. 2002. General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law. 4th ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anstey, Peter R. 2011. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aritonang, Dinoroy Marganda. 2013. “Peranan Dan Problematika Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Dan Kewenangannya.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi 10, no. 3.
Asshidiqie, Jimly. 2016. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara . Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Ayittey, George B.N. 2024. “Constitutional Checks and Balances in Traditional Africa.” In Constitutional Identity and Constitutionalism in Africa, 50–73. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198906308.003.0005.
Beitz, Charles R. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bookbinder, Paul. 1987. “Hermann Heller Versus Carl Schmitt.” International Social Science Review 62, no. 3: 119–27.
Calvin, Mathew-John. 2019. Re-Uniting the States. Bloomington: LifeRich Publishing.
Carothers, Thomas. 1998. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 77, no. 2: 95. https://doi.org/10.2307/20048791.
Ilham, Muhammad. 2024. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Konstitusional Di Era Modern.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (June): 467–79. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9643.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. 2010. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Krause, Sharon. 2000. “The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” The Review of Politics 62, no. 2 (August): 231–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500029454.
Kurnia, Titon Slamet. 2024. “Presiden Dan Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi: Pemisahan Kekuasaan Tanpa Checks and Balances.” Veritas et Justitia 10, no. 1 (June): 60–84. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v10i1.7735.
Miriam Budiardjo. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Qamar, Nurul, and Farah Syah Rezah. 2023. “Wewenang Sebagai Instrumen Penyelenggararaan Pemerintahan Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum.” Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan 2, no. 2 (July): 201–22. https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v2i2.1781.
Rahman, Isya Salsabila, Utang Rosidin, and Muhammad Alwi Khoiri Ramdani. 2024. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Lembaga Superbody Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (June): 35–46. https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuniya.v1i1.820.