Akibat Hukum atas Alokasi Anggaran Pendidikan yang Kurang dari 20% Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: The existence of a pandemic has greatly affected the financial capacity of the Regional Government, so that there are regions that have not been able to meet the education budget allocation of at least 20% of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget because the priority for handling and recovering from the impact of the pandemic is dominant and urgent to implement.
Purpose: This study aims to provide academic descriptions and recommendations to regional governments in allocating the education budget according to their authority in regional autonomy.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Research methods uses normative juridical research methods based on juridical aspects such as: norms, laws and regulations, and legal theories related to the authority to allocate the education budget obtained from scientific works, books, online media, and so on related to the object the research studied.
Findings: This study discusses the legitimacy of regional regulations and the legal responsibilities of regional governments that allocate an education budget of less than 20% of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget. Problems arise because there are regions that have not been able to meet the education budget allocation of at least 20% of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget so that the Regional Government and the Regional People's Representative Council are faced with a difficult position when setting/approving the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget, because it is considered to have caused delegitimization of the constitution as the highest law.
Originality/Value: This research comprehensively explains the legality of regional regulations which in substance have not fulfilled the mandate of the constitution. Then, this study also explains the legal responsibilities that will be faced by regional governments due to the unfulfilled constitutional mandate.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Andi Pangerang Moenta, and Syafa’at Anugrah Pradana. 2018. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Batubara, Helfinasyam. 2022. “ANALISIS PERENCANAAN ANGGARAN PENDAPATAN BELANJA PENDIDIKAN.” PENDALAS: Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 2, no. 3 (November): 258–69. https://doi.org/10.47006/pendalas.v2i3.169.
Dewi, Avitta Karunia, and Risma Wira Bharata. 2021. “TUGAS DAN WEWENANG DPRD DALAM PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI ANGGARAN TERHADAP ANGGARAN PENDAPATAN DAN BELANJA DAERAH (APBD) PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH.” Jurnal Edukasi (Ekonomi, Pendidikan Dan Akuntansi) 9, no. 1 (June): 5. https://doi.org/10.25157/je.v9i1.4502.
Fikri, Sultoni. 2020. “TANGGUNGGUGAT PEMERINTAH DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN.” Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v6i2.149.
Hamid, Edy Suandi. 2003. “Anggaran Pendidikan Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945.” Unisia 26, no. 49 (September): 267–72. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol26.iss49.art5.
JahJa, Yudrik. 2007. “KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM ANGGARAN SEKTOR PENDIDIKAN.” Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan 15, no. VIII (April): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.151.14.
Jimly Asshidiqie. 2016. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara . Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Johny Ibrahim. 2010. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Olanie Vabiola Bangun, and Robby Alexander Sirait. 2020. “Wajah Pendidikan Indonesia Paska Alokasi Anggaran 20 Persen Untuk Pendidikan.” ResearchGate. August 2020.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2016. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
———. 2020. Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
———. 2022. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Paulus Efendie Lotulung, Laica H.M Marzuki, Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, and I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana. 2021. Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.
Philipus M Hadjon, and R. Sri Soemantri Martosoewignjo. 2008. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada university Press.
Putu Eka Pitriyantini. 2019. “PERATURAN KEBIJAKAN YANG MENIMBULKAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA SEBAGAI UNSUR TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 5, no. 2.
Rini Wulandari. 2021. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Aplikasi Anggaran 20% Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Nasional.” PUSKAPSI Law Review 1, no. 1 (May): 29. https://doi.org/10.19184/puskapsi.v1i1.23648.
Rusdianto Sesung. 2013. Hukum Otonomi Daerah. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sabina, Vina, Maychellina, and Sultoni Fikri. 2023. “KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN/KOTA DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN.” Journal Evidence of Law 2, no. 1 (February): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v2i1.231.
Selly Rahmawati. 2015. “Analisis Kebijakan Pendanaan Pendidikan.” Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.
Sultoni Fikri, and Rizky Bangun Wibisono. 2023. “Principle of Original Authority in Territorial Decentralization.” Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia 2, no. 1.
WAHYUDIN, DINDIN. 2019. “ISU-ISU TENTANG EFISIENSI TATA KELOLA ORGANISASI DAN ANGGARAN PENDIDIKAN.” Foramadiahi: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Keislaman 10, no. 1 (October): 110. https://doi.org/10.46339/foramadiahi.v10i1.117.
Yusnani Hasyimzoem, Iwan Satriawan, Ade Arif Firmansyah, and Siti Khoiriah. 2019. Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Zahruddin, Zahruddin. 2019. “IMPLEMENTASI PENYUSUSNAN RENCANA ANGGARAN PENDAPATAN DAN BELANJA SEKOLAH.” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan 26, no. 1 (September): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v26i1.19847.