Election Dispute Resolution and Justice as Fairness: A Study of Regional Head Elections in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: The concept of justice is still relevant for debate, involving two political and legal perspectives. However, the two met in the context of resolving election disputes. Namely the election justice mechanism to resolve all forms of election disputes. This study will focus on resolving election result disputes, the 2020 Regional Head Election Results Dispute. John Rawls is a philosopher and political theorist who strongly influenced the tradition of justice theory. The concept of justice is offered from criticism of utilitarianism and intuitionism. Justice as fairness is a concept of justice that is procedurally fair but also justice that benefits as well as opportunities that are just (equal).
Purpose: This article aims to elaborate Regional Head Election Results Dispute from Rawls’ justice as fairness approach to resolve election disputes.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is qualitative research. Using a descriptive approach and literature study as data collection techniques.
Findings: There is still a serious debate about achieving the concept of justice between substantive and procedural justice in electoral studies regarding the equitable settlement of election result disputes. A just Regional Head Election Results Dispute indicates the degree of democracy in implementing direct, general, free, confidential, and honest, fair elections (LUBER JURDIL). Constitutional democracy is a meeting point between Rawls' democratic tradition and Plato's nomocracy.
Originality/value: Many articles on Regional Head Election Results Dispute philosophically explain Rawls’ justice as a fairness concept. However, this article explores the relationship between Regional Head Election Results Dispute phenomenon through Rawls’ philosophical concepts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anggara, Satya. 2013. “Teori Keadilan John Rawls Kritik Terhadap Demokrasi Liberal.” JISPO 1.
Arta, Ketut Sedana. 2020. “SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN DEMOKRASI LIBERAL DAN TERCAPAINYA PEMILIHAN UMUM I PADA TAHUN 1955 DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Widya Citra 1, no. 2.
Chalik, Abdul. 2017. Pertarungan Elit Dalam Politik Lokal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fadjar, A. Mukhtie. 2010. Konstitusionalime Demokrasi: Sebuah Diskursus Tentang Pemilu, Otonomi Daerah Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Malang: Intrans.
Gaffar, Janedjri M. 2012. Demokrasi Konstitusional: Praktek Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Halim, Abdul. 2014. Politik Lokal: Pola, Aktor, Dan Alur Dramatikal (Perspektif Teori Powercube, Modal Dan Panggung). Yogyakarta: LP2B.
Haryadi, Achmad Dodi. 2012. Demokrasi Lokal: Evaluasi Pemilukada Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Hasanuddin, Iqbal. 2018. “Keadilan Sosial: Telaah Atas Filsafat Politik John Rawls.” Refleksi 17, no. 2 (December): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v17i2.10205.
Hidayat, Rayhan Naufaldi, and Tanti Oktari. 2023. “Dialektika Praktik Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Penafsiran Hakim Dan Kebiasaan Ketatanegaraan Pasca Reformasi.” Al Daulah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 12, no. 1.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1995. Gelombang Demokrastisasi Ketiga. Jakarta: Grafiti.
Indarto, Ervan Kus, and Sultoni Fikri. 2022. “Discourse on Procedural Democracy: Study of the ‘Empty Box’ Phenomenon in Regional Head Elections.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 5, no. 12.
Jaya Miha, Ida Puspa. 2015. “URGENSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PILKADA OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 4, no. 3 (September). https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i03.p03.
Karina, Eva Novi. 2019. “Kontradiksi Demokrasi Liberal Dan ‘Akhir Sejarah’ Yang Tertunda.” Nation State Journal of International Studies 2, no. 1 (June): 88–104. https://doi.org/10.24076/NSJIS.2019v2i1.148.
Marijan, Kacung. 2010. Sistem Politik Indonesia: Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca Orde Baru. Jakarta: Prenada Kencana Media Group.
Michener, Greg, and Katherine Bersch. 2013. “Identifying Transparency.” Information Polity 18.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurhasim, Moch. 2005. Konflik Antar Elit Politik Lokal Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
———. 2009. Konflik Dalam Pilkada Langsung (2005-2008): Studi Tentang Penyebab Dan Dampak Konflik. Jakarta: LIPI.
Nuryanti, Sri. 2006. Analisa Proses Dan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung 2005 Di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI.
O’Donnell, Guillermo, C. Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead, eds. 1993. Transisi Menuju Demokrasi: Kasus Amerika Latin. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Otoala, Miguel Angel Lara. 2017. “When, Where and under What Conditions Are Election Results Accepted? A Comparative Study of Electoral Integrity.” University of Sussex.
Rahmawati, Reza Yuna Dwi, and Sultoni Fikri. 2022. “Urgensi Penggunaan E-Votting Dalam Sistem Pemilu Dan Pilkada Serentak 2024 Di Kota Surabaya.” Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah 2, no. 4.
Rozi, Syafuan. 2006. Netralitas Birokrasi Dalam Pilkada Langsung Di Indonesia 2005: Studi Kasus Malang, Gowa, Dan Kutai Kertanegara. Jakarta: LIPI.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 2003. Kapitalisme, Sosialisme Dan Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sunaryo, Sunaryo. 2022. “Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik Dan Relevansinya.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (March): 001. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911.
Surbakti, Ramlan, Didik Supriyanto, and Topo Santoso. 2008. Perekayasaan Sistem: Pemilihan Umum Untuk Pembangunan Tata Politik Demokratis. Jakarta: Kemitraan Partnership.
Tambunan, Sihol Farida. 2008. “KEADILAN SEBAGAI PEMECAH MASALAH KONFLIK ANTARA KEKUASAAN (POWER) DAN HAK KEPEMILIKAN (PROPERTY RIGHT) DALAM NEGARA DEMOKRASI (Sebuah Tinjauan Filsafat).” Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 10, no. 2.
Ujan, Andre Ata. 2001. Keadilan Dan Demokrasi: Telaah Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Utomo, Ari Nur, and Malik Akbar Mulki Rahman. 2023. “Model Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada.” Al-Ijtima`i: International Journal of Government and Social Science 8, no. 2 (April): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.22373/jai.v8i2.2461.