Understanding Local Governance in the Circle of Interest: A Literature Review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Local public administration is a field that positively reflects organizational needs. As a result, public administration is required to provide concrete representation of its suitability to be called a public organization. Paradoxically, when local government public administration emphasizes representation, it has no substantive meaning.
Purpose: This is the result of the interests of actors who have carved out administrative boundaries.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses a literature review that raises local issues conditioned in the form of specific subheadings with limitations. Maximizing data based on relevant research and sources forces this study to extract metadata from the data. To maximize metadata conditions, this study limits several relevant notes to support the main focus on public governance in the arena of interest.
Findings: The results of the study show that pragmatic governance under pressure from capital owners has defeated senior policy experts, intellectual groups, and even political actors themselves. This existence is reflected in selective diction. This confirms the next finding, a shift from potential policies to administrative violations. The procurement of goods and services has become the most distributive consequence, ensuring that the basis for selective implementation is accommodated in concrete terms. Restoring the spirit of independence of supervisory institutions and involving external civil society-based institutions are areas that need to be considered in both the process and implementation.
Originality/value: The conditioning of public governance does not ensure that it has been addressed by different actors with diverse focuses.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adi, M. W. P., Habbodin, M., & Hakim, M. L. (2024). Resistensi Sosial atas Praktik Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa di Kabupaten Malang. In Sospol.
Agnew, J. (2005). Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Temple University Press.
Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664.
Aksan, M., Mas, M., & Renggong, R. (2021). Analisis Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Terhadap PNS dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 4(1), 93–96.
Alasiri, A. A., & Mohammed, V. (2022). Healthcare transformation in Saudi Arabia: an overview since the launch of vision 2030. Health services insights, 15, 11786329221121214.
Beerepoot, I., Di Ciccio, C., Reijers, H. A., Rinderle-Ma, S., Bandara, W., Burattin, A., Calvanese, D., Chen, T., Cohen, I., & Depaire, B. (2023). The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die. Computers in Industry, 146, 103837.
Bourdieu, P. (2020). Outline of a Theory of Practice. In The new social theory reader (hal. 80–86). Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cao, Y., Feng, Z., Mor, V., & Du, P. (2023). Unmet needs and associated factors among community-living older people with disability in China: 2005–2014. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 35(5), 648–666.
Carolina, J. (2025). Indonesia’s former president included in 2024 global ‘Most Corrupt’ list. GlobalVoices. https://globalvoices.org/2025/02/11/indonesias-former-president-included-in-2024-global-most-corrupt-list/
Chong, N., Akobirshoev, I., Caldwell, J., Kaye, H. S., & Mitra, M. (2022). The relationship between unmet need for home and community-based services and health and community living outcomes. Disability and health journal, 15(2), 101222.
Chumo, I., Kabaria, C., Shankland, A., & Mberu, B. (2022). Unmet needs and resilience: the case of vulnerable and marginalized populations in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Sustainability, 15(1), 37.
Clifford, B., Gunn, S., Inch, A., Schoneboom, A., Slade, J., Tait, M., & Vigar, G. (2024). Realising the public interest in planning? In The Future for Planners (hal. 185–206). Policy Press.
Corruption Perceptions Index. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index. Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024/index/idn
de Benedictis‐Kessner, J., Jones, D., & Warshaw, C. (2025). How partisanship in cities influences housing policy. American Journal of Political Science, 69(1), 64–77.
Dengah, H., & Rahman, M. (2024). Efektivitas Hukum Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa di Sulawesi Selatanpenyidikan tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa di sulawesi selatan. Jurnal Tana Mana, 5(1), 111–121.
Dewi, N. K. (2024). Reformasi 1998 : Transisi dari Orde Baru ke Era Demokrasi di Indonesia. 04(02), 76–90.
Dwi, A. (2025). Indeks Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Tertinggal Jauh, Indonesia Harus Serius Berantas Korupsi. RMOL.ID. https://rmol.id/politik/read/2025/03/12/659399/indeks-tata-kelola-pemerintahan-tertinggal-jauh-indonesia-harus-serius-berantas-korupsi
Fahrurozi, S. H. (2025). LSI Denny JA: Indeks Tata Kelola Indonesia Masih Tertinggal. SindoNews. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1541253/15/lsi-denny-ja-indeks-tata-kelola-indonesia-masih-tertinggal-1741698221
Fossati, D. (2016). Beyond “Good Governance”: The Multi-level Politics of Health Insurance for the Poor in Indonesia. World Development, 87, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.020
Gebrihet, H. G., & Eidsvik, E. (2024). African democracy in the context of agenda 2063: examining progress and challenges. Social sciences, 13(8), 429.
Hamdhani, A. F., & Susilo, A. A. (2024). A Local democracy and corruption: Economic-political relations in the corruption case of Batu City’s Mayor. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 95–106.
Hancock, G. (1989). Lords of poverty: The power, prestige, and corruption of the international aid business. Atlantic Monthly Press.
Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. U. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: a case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation And Governance, 23(6), 598–616.
Indrawan, J., Ilmar, A., & Simanihuruk, H. (2020). Korupsi dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Pemerintah Daerah. 6(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2020.006.02.1
Jang, H., & Kreiss, D. (2025). Safeguarding the peaceful transfer of power: Pro-democracy electoral frames and journalist coverage of election deniers during the 2022 US midterm elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(3), 775–796.
Juniamalia, A., Faridah, H., & Apriyanti. (2023). Strategi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kasus Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Di Bidang Kontruks. 3(16), 12–22.
Ke, X.-T., Wang, C.-L., Salmon, J. W., & Tang, W.-X. (2021). Unmet needs as indicator of improving chronic care delivery system in China. Chronic diseases and translational medicine, 7(01), 1–13.
Koinova, M. (2025). Governing transit and irregular migration: informality and formal policies. In Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (Vol. 51, Nomor 2, hal. 423–444). Taylor & Francis.
KPK. (2025). TPK INSTANSI. Komisi Pemeberantasan Korupsi. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2
Kurlantzick, J. (2024). The Tragedy of Joko Widodo. COUNCIL on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/blog/tragedy-joko-widodo
Kurniawan, M. R., & Pujiyono, P. (2018). Modus operandi korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah oleh PNS. Law Reform, 14(1), 115–131.
Lu, P., Shelley, M., & Kong, D. (2021). Unmet community service needs and life satisfaction among Chinese older adults: a longitudinal study. Social work in public health, 36(6), 665–676.
Martono. (2025). Asal Bapak Senang’ dalam Dunia Pemerintahan, Budaya Feodal dan Krisis Integritas Aparatur. kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/bahanana3508/68eefc0c34777c364040c9c3/asal-bapak-senang-dalam-dunia-pemerintahan-budaya-feodal-dan-krisis-integritas-aparatur
Nastitie, D. P. (2023). Indonesia’s Rule of Law Index Stagnant During Jokowi’s Administration. KOMPAS.com. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-indeks-hukum-indonesia-stagnan-selama-pemerintahan-jokowi
Nugraha, I. N., & Putra, A. (2017). Turbulensi dan legalisasi kleptokrasi dalam pengelolaan keuangan desa. 244–261.
Nurhikmahyanti, D. (2024). Strategi Pengembangan Sumber Daya Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Indonesia: Tinjauan Terhadap Kebijakan dan Implementasi Manajemen. Jurnal Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, 3(2), 46–57.
Papyshev, G. (2025). Reversing the logic of generative AI alignment: a pragmatic approach for public interest. Data & Policy, 7, e30.
Purnamasari, D. D. (2025). In 2024, Corruption Perception Index Score Increases. KOMPAS.com. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-ipk-2024-indonesia-berhasil-keluar-dari-stagnansi-dua-tahun-berturut-turut
Putra, E. A. M., Hamdani, F., Fauzia, A., & Kusumawarni, B. A. (2024). Aspek Hukum Administrasi dan Hukum Pidana dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa: Peranannya dalam Mewujudkan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa yang Akuntabel. Lex Renaissance, 9(1), 179–202.
Putra, F., & Arif, S. (2001). Kapitalisme Birokrasi. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. Routledge.
Safdar, S., Khan, A., & Andlib, Z. (2022). Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(55), 82948–82965.
Sapta, I. H. (2025). Jurnal Politik When Civil Society Defends Authoritarianism : Thai Bhakdi , We Support Prayuth , and Thailand ’ s Democratic Decline When Civil Society Defends Authoritarianism : Thai Bhakdi , We Support Prayuth ,. 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v11i1.1274
Sihidi, I. T. (2025). The Rise of Symptoms of Digital Authoritarianism : Lesson from Indonesia. 2(1), 29–44.
Soesastro, H. (2003). Governance and the crisis in Indonesia. In Reform and Recovery in East Asia (hal. 135–159). Routledge.
Sujarwoto. (2017). Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review Sujarwoto a ? 1(3), 1–10.
Syafrina, N. (2024). Tanggungjawab Pengelolaan Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Dalam Mempercepat Pembangunan Di Kota Binjai (Studi pada Unit Kerja Bagian Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa). Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara.
Vasan, A., Darko, O., Fortin, K., Scribano, P. V, & Kenyon, C. C. (2022). Community Resource Connection for Pediatric Caregivers With Unmet Social Needs: A Qualitative Study. Academic Pediatrics, 22(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.09.010
Wahyu, M., & Adi, P. (2025). Preventing Money Politics : Bawaslu Role in Batu City Regional Head Election. 6(April), 111–122.
Wahyu, M. W. P. A. (2025). Preventing Money Politics: Bawaslu Role in Batu City Regional Head Election. Journal of Government Science (GovSci) : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(2 SE-Article), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.54144/govsci.v6i2.123
Wallerstein, I. (2003). US Weakness and the Struggle for Hegemony. MONTHLY REVIEW-NEW YORK-, 55(3), 23–29.
World Economics Research. (2025). Indonesia’s Governance Index: 47.4 GOVERNANCE IMPACT FACTORS. World Economics Research. https://www.worldeconomics.com/ESG/Governance/Indonesia.aspx
Xu, Z., Liu, Z., & Luo, H. (2025). Can Artificial Intelligence Technology Help Achieving Good Governance: A Public Policy Evaluation Method Based on Artificial Neural Network. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440251317830.