Antara Etnosentrisme dan Demokrasi: Konflik Etnis Dayak-Madura
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to discuss the issue of ethnocentrism and democracy in Indonesia with case studies in two regions. Firstly, ethnocentrism as the root and source of conflict between ethnic Dayak and Madurese in Sampit, Central Kalimantan Province.
Purpose: This article aims to discuss the issue of ethnocentrism in the Dayak and Madurese conflict.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is qualitative research. By using a descriptive approach and data collection techniques using literature study.
Findings: The conflict between Dayak and Madurese was caused by the sentiments of the two ethnicities. Ethnic differences are used as sentiments to compete in various aspects of social, economic, and, politics. Ethnic differences and diversity that are expected to go hand in hand and complement each other with the democratic system in Indonesia still reap many problems. The democratic system seems to open space for the emergence of inter-ethnic conflicts. This is certainly a challenge for the Indonesian people. The government needs to always encourage and open space to conduct political socialization to all Indonesian people and community or ethnic groups, especially those related to the values of nationalism, tolerance, and Indonesian unity.
Originality/Value: Many have discussed issues related to ethnocentrism, both Dayak and Madurese conflicts. But this research is more directed at the issue of ethnocentrism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bashori, Khoiruddin, Abd. Madjid, and Mahli Zainuddin Tago. 2012. “Dinamika Konflik Dan Integrasi Antara Etnis Dayak Dan Etnis Madura (Studi Kasus Di Yogyakarta Malang Dan Sampit).” Afkaruna 8 (1).
Budiardjo, Miriam. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dyke, Vernon van. 1960. Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Eriyanto. 2004. Media Dan Konflik Etnis: Bagaimana Surat Kabar Di Kalimantan Meliput Dan Memberitakan Konflik Di Sampit 2001. Jakarta: Institut Studi Arus Informasi (ISAI).
Firdausi, Fadrik Aziz. 2018. “Provokasi Elit Berujung Pembantaian Sampit.” Tirto.Id. 2018. https://tirto.id/provokasi-elit-berujung-pembantaian-sampit-cEWZ.
Geertz, Clifford. 1963. The Integrative Revolution: Primordial and Civil Politics in the New State. New York: Free Press.
Khadijah. 2018. “Model Komunikasi Antarbudaya Etnis Madura dan Etnis Dayak di Desa Basawang Kabupaten Kotawaringin.” Jurnal Transformatif 2 (1).
Mumtazinur. 2017. “Konflik Etnis Dayak Dan Madura Dalam Masalah Hutan Kalimantan: Perspektif Green Though.” Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial VIII (2).
Panji, Abdur Rahman. 2003. “Tragedi Sampit 2001 Dan Imbasnya Ke Palangkaraya: Dari Konflik Ke Rekonstruksi.” Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya 5 (2).
Sari, Elia Nurindah, and Samsuri. 2020. “Etnosentrisme Dan Sikap Intoleran Pendatang Terhadap Orang Papua.” Jantro: Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya 22 (1).
Sutianti. 2020. “Dinamika Konflik Antar Etnis Dayak Dan Etnis Madura Di Samalantan Kalimantan Barat.” International Journal of Demos 2 (1).
Tanasaldy, T. 2009. “Politik Identitas Etnis Di Kalimantan Barat.” In Politik Lokal Di Indonesia, edited by Henk Schulte Nordholt and Gerry van Klinken. Yayasan Pustakan Obor Indonesia.
Wahyudi, Syukron. 2019. “Implikasi Kerusuhan 1999 terhadap Interaksi Sosial Keagamaan Etnis Melayu dan Madura di Kalimantan Barat.” Religi: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 15 (2).