Section Policies

Artikel

Open Submission --- Indexed --- Peer Reviewed

 

Focus and Scope

Journal Of Economic Cluster is a peer-reviewed journal on economics science. Specifically, the journal will deal with following topics:

Monetary Economy

Public Economics

Human Resource Economics

Accounting

Management

Development Economics

Economic Education

Financial Economics

Islamic Economics

Institutional Economics

Monetary Economics

 

Peer Review Process 

All manuscripts submitted to Journal Of Economic Cluster must adhere to the focus and scope of the journal and the author guidelines. Submitted manuscripts should address scientific merit or novelty that fits the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free of plagiarism content. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to perform similarity checks. The editor checks the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using Turnitin software.
Research articles submitted to this journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers provide valuable scientific comments to improve the content of the manuscript.
The final decision of acceptance of the article will be made by the Editor in accordance with the reviewers' comments. Publication of accepted articles including the order of published articles will be done by the Editor-in-Chief taking into account the order of date of receipt and geographical distribution of authors.

 

Publication Frequency

Journal Of Economic Cluster Published four times a year in March, June, September and December

 

Privacy Statement

All names and e-mail address that stated in this Journal portal specifically will be used for journal publication purpose and will be not used for other purpose or any irresponsible parties.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge

 

Publication Ethic

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in the blindly reviewed Journal of Cluster Economics is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on expected standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.

CV Era Digital Nusantara as the publisher of Iqtishadia Journal takes its trusteeship over all stages of publishing seriously and we are aware of its ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Archiving Policy

The editors of the Journal of Economic Cluster are responsible for deciding which articles to publish. The validity of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive the decision. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by applicable legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making these decisions.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper

 

Plagiarism Policy

1. The articles sent by the author must be an original script and is not being considered for publication and not being published by other journal or publishers. This is done through a waiver of rights of copyright to the publisher and a statement about plagiarism filled by the author.
2. JoEC checked all of submitted works by anti-plagiarism software (Grammarly or Turnitin). Plagiarism detected works will be banned for further publication procedure.
3. Articles reviewed by peer review team who are competent in their field as a way to control plagiarism.