Legal Consequences Of Breach Of Contract In Mobile Phone Sale And Purchase Agreements (A Study Of Malang District Court Decision Number 149/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Mlg)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Technological growth in Indonesia is advancing rapidly as public demand for communication devices increases, driving significant growth in the mobile phone market—both online and offline. However, the high demand for quality technology has led to the emergence of disputes in mobile phone sales. This is exemplified by the Malang District Court Decision Number 149/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Mlg regarding a sales agreement between PT. Sentral Global Mitra Sejahtera and FitraArdhitaNurullisha Putra, in which the debtor defaulted. Based on this, the author focuses the research as follows: 1) Factors causing breach of contract in mobile phone sales agreements; 2) How judges consider the case when adjudicating mobile phone sales agreements; and 3) The legal consequences of breach of contract in mobile phone sales agreements. The type of research used is normative legal research, which involves analyzing, observing, and examining legal materials obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The results of this study indicate that the legal consequences of breach of contract in a mobile phone sales agreement, as seen in Malang District Court Decision Number 149/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Mlg, arose due to the defendant’s delay in making the final payment to the plaintiff, even though the plaintiff had attempted to contact the buyer personally. The plaintiff also attempted to issue a formal notice, but the defendant did not demonstrate good faith. The defendant, having been found in breach of contract, must pay the plaintiff the sum of IDR146,594,500.00, as well as court costs amounting to IDR 267,700.00.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anggriani, R., & Fadilla, F. I. (2023). Itikad baik pembeli tanah sebagai jaminan perlindungan hukum terhadap wanprestasi penjual (Studi kasus Putusan No. 9/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kln.). Arena Hukum, 16(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.9
Dalimunthe, D. (2017). Akibat hukum wanprestasi dalam perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW). Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, 3(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v3i1.1444
Gandžalová, D. (2024). Legestic Legestic. 2, 7–15.
Gulo, H. I. (2024). Analisis hukum pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan pada perkara wanprestasi (Studi Putusan Nomor 760/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Mdn). Jurnal Panah Hukum, 4(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.57094/jph.v4i1.1409
Herry, M., Andrias, M. Y., & Gani, N. (2025). Drafting legal and profitable business contracts: Legal aspects to be aware of. 2(2), 1–14.
Hertanto, S., & Djajaputra, G. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap penyelesaian wanprestasi dalam perjanjian jual beli. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10368–10380. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1905
K, K. C. Y., Musfiroh, A., Dardiri, M., & Efendi, M. N. L. S. (2024). Bahtsul masail’s critical review of fake order online on the digital Shopee live platform. 8(2), 17–28.
Khair, U. (2017). Analisis yuridis perjanjian pembiayaan konsumen dan akibat hukum jika terjadi wanprestasi dalam perjanjian pembiayaan konsumen di Indonesia. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 3(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i1.7
Muhammad Riandi Nur Ridwan, & Yana Sukma Permana. (2022). Wanprestasi dan akibatnya dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian. The Juris, 6(2), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.616
Nawawie, K. (2019). Analisis pertimbangan hakim dalam perkara perdata tentang wanprestasi perjanjian pemberian jasa. Jurnal Varia Hukum, 31(40). https://doi.org/10.32502/jvh.v31i40
Nugrahenti, M. C., & Hernawan, A. (2024). Good faith principle in Indonesian contract law: How to set the definition and its benchmarks. 8(10), 1–16.
Nur Azza Morlin Iwanti, & Taun. (2022). Akibat hukum wanprestasi serta upaya hukum wanprestasi berdasarkan undang-undang yang berlaku. The Juris, 6(2), 361–351. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.601
Santika, I., & Putra Pratama, B. (2022). Pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara wanprestasi antara debitur dan kreditur dalam perjanjian kredit kendaraan bermotor roda empat. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 1(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.31933/h9vj0z39
Santoso, L. (2012). Hukum perjanjian kontrak. Cakrawala.
Saputra, T. E., Askaruddin, M., Qamar, N., & Kamal, M. (2026). Force majeure in the perspective of the concept of justice in modern business contracts: A study of the COVID-19 pandemic. 126–139.
Setiawan, A., Kautsarina, M., Rafizan, O., & Sastrosubroto, A. S. (2017). Development of the information and communication technology service industry in Indonesia. 1–16.
Sibarani, C. S., Putri, S. E., & Hutahaean, T. C. (2025). Negligence in fulfilling contractual obligations. 3, 1346–1358.
Siregar, N. J., Amira, T., & Siregar, F. (2025). Force majeure as a ground for exemption from breach of contract in civil law. 11(2), 309–318.
Siringo Ringo, D. A. F. (2022). Akibat hukum wanprestasi perjanjian jual beli di bawah tangan (Studi kasus tanah kavling di Jalan Simpang Pir Kecamatan Tandun Rokan Hulu). Universitas Islam Riau.
Sulistianingsih, D., Chandra, C., & Mohd, R. (2024). Juridical consequences of anticipatory breach as a form of breach of contract. 9(1), 131–154.
Susilowati, E., Endrawati, E., & Aprilyansyah, M. S. (2024). Kedudukan dan manfaat logika dalam penalaran hukum oleh hakim. Jurnal Sociopolitico, 6(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.54683/sociopolitico.v6i2.146
Triana, Y., Info, A., & Majeure, F. (2024). The debtor’s void claims against the debtor’s obstacles of achievement are disclaimed. 23(3), 1505–1518.
Wahid, A., Rohadi, & Badriyah, S. M. (2022). Serba-serbi memahami hukum perjanjian di Indonesia. Deepublish.
Zendrato, F. (2025). Laws of evidence in the resolution of state administrative disputes and criminal cases. 15(03), 914–918. https://doi.org/10.58471/justi.v15i03