Legal Analysis of Insurance Defaults: A Review of Decision No. 209/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Pst Jo. Supreme Court Decision No. 3803 K/Pdt/2025

Main Article Content

Rusly Rusly
Appe Hutauruk
Amin Saleh

Abstract

This study addresses two problems: (1) the application of breach of contract (wanprestasi) concerning insurance claim payments, and (2) the judges’ considerations in Decision Number 209/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, the research analyzes primary legal materials (the Civil Code, the Commercial Code, Law Number 40 of 2014, OJK regulations, court decisions), secondary materials, and tertiary materials through qualitative descriptive-prescriptive techniques. The findings reveal. First, under the Civil Code, breach of contract encompasses non-performance, late performance, defective performance, and prohibited acts, while Decision 83/PUU-XXII/2024 restricts unilateral claim rejections. Second, judges across three levels ruled the defendant committed a breach of contract because the insured object was coal, making the vessel’s accident immaterial; the Loss Ratio interpretation was reasonable; the insurer was negligent during underwriting; force majeure was proven; and the rejection lacked legal basis. Ultimately, this decision strengthens consumer protection, elevates insurer standards, ensures legal certainty, and aligns with Constitutional Court’s ruling, marking a new era in Indonesian insurance law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rusly, R., Hutauruk, A., & Saleh, A. (2026). Legal Analysis of Insurance Defaults: A Review of Decision No. 209/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Pst Jo. Supreme Court Decision No. 3803 K/Pdt/2025 . Journal Evidence Of Law, 5(1), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v5i1.2247
Section
Articles

References

Adam, R., & Anwar, S. (2021). Kedudukan Tertanggung dalam Asuransi Jiwa Kredit. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v5i1.2181

Maunah, N. A., Sunargo, B., & Mahadewi, E. P. (2023). Application Of The Utmost Good Faith Principle In Life Insurance Business Management In Indonesia. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 4(4), 924-930. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i4.844

Oswari, D. O. (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Kerugian Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Kontrak Bisnis. Jurnal Jendela Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.32663/7v150r87

Pasaribu, T. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Polis yang Gagal Bayar Asuransi Jiwa di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Kristen Indonesia).

Putri, R. R. S. A. I. (2024). Penerapan Prinsip Subrogasi Dalam Perjanjian Asuransi Pengangkutan Atas Kerugian yang diakibatkan Oleh Pihak Ketiga (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Rambe, S. H., & Sekarayu, P. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Atas Gagal Klaim Asuransi Akibat Ketidaktransparanan Informasi Polis Asuransi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4073

Saputra, A., Listiyorini, D., & Muzayanah, M. (2021). Tanggungjawab Asuransi Dalam Mekanisme Klaim Pada Perjanjian Asuransi Berdasarkan Prinsip Utmost Good Faith. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.32722

Sari, F. P. (2024). Tinjuan Hukum Perdata Terhadap Penggunaan Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Dalam Kegiatan Bisnis. Selodang Mayang: Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, 10(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.47521/selodangmayang.v10i3.408

Sari, T. N., Rasmiaty, M., & Anggraini, D. P. (2023). Asuransi dan Literasi Keuangan. Penerbit Tahta Media.

Siregar, B. J., Saragih, A., Maryani, H., & Halim, A. (2023). Aspek Hukum Terkait Dengan Perjanjian Asuransi Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(3), 299-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3641

Suparidho, F., & Muhammad, A. S. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Akibat terjadinya wanprestasi dalam perjanjian sewa menyewa berdasarkan KUHPerdata. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(11), 7384-7388. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i11.7509

Syafi'i, A. D., Widiyanto, A. P., Friyadhi, N. F., Dewi, U. K., Fadilla, D. A., Lubis, T., & Ramadhani, D. A. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa Terhadap Kegagalan Pembayaran Klaim Asuransi Jiwa Bakrie: Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwa. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 9(1), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v9i1.9488

Syafitri, I., Kamello, T., & Purba, H. (2025). Contemporary Legal Certainty in Insurance Default Claims: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Positive Law Perspectives. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 539-565. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10465

Syed, R. F. (2023). Compliance with and enforcement mechanism of labor law: cost-benefits analysis from employers’ perspective in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-023-00179-0

Tinambunan, H. S. R., & Jalianery, J. (2025). The Principle of Utmost Good Faith in Insurance Following the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 83/PUU-XXII/2024. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 7632-7646. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6940