Non-Compliance Of Tun Officials Towards Ptun Decisions From The Perspective Of Fiqih Siyasah: A Case Study In Seluma Regency
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study discusses the phenomenon of non-compliance of State Administrative (TUN) officials in Seluma Regency with the decisions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) which have permanent legal force. Failure to implement PTUN decisions has a negative impact on legal certainty and reduces public trust in the justice system. This study uses a qualitative approach through a case study in Seluma Regency with in-depth interview data collection techniques and documentation studies. The results of the study indicate that the main causes of non-compliance are weak supervision, political intervention, low legal awareness of officials, and weak implementation of administrative sanctions. From the perspective of fiqh siyasah, non-compliance of officials violates the principles of justice and trust in leadership, so solutions are needed based on increasing accountability, legal education, and bureaucratic reform. The recommendations of this study include strengthening sanctions, transparency in the implementation of PTUN decisions, and socialization of fiqh siyasah values in governance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Ghazali. (2003). Nasihat al-Muluk. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Khatib, M. (2023). Ethics and Accountability in Islamic Public Administration. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 9(1), 99–115.
Al-Mubarak, S. (2020). Political Leadership in Islam: A Fiqh Siyasah Perspective. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 58(1), 143–161.
Anderson, M. (2021). Corruption and Governance in Developing Countries. Journal of Public Administration Research, 11(1), 12–28.
Astuti, R. (2022). Problematika Eksekusi Putusan PTUN di Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(1), 45–59.
Aziz, R. (2022). Hisbah and Syura: Mechanisms for Accountability in Islamic Governance. Islamic Governance Review, 5(2), 30–48.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Darminto, S. (2022). Normative Gaps in PTUN Implementation. Administrative Law Review, 11(1), 55-70.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Fauzi, A. (2022). Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Tinjauan terhadap Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 8(2), 77–95.
Handayani, N., & Nugroho, S. (2020). Understanding of PTUN Procedures among Regional Officials. Jurnal Pendidikan Hukum Indonesia, 6(2), 144-157.
Huda, N. (2021). Pemahaman Aparatur Sipil Negara terhadap Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(4), 89–102.
Ismail, A. (2022). Fiqh Siyasah dalam Pemerintahan Modern. Jurnal Studi Islam Politik, 5(1), 88-102.
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2019). Interviews in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Kurniawan, D. et al. (2021). Public Trust and Rule of Law in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Ethics, 12(2), 67-81.
Lestari, P. (2022). Legal Culture and Bureaucratic Disobedience. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, 19(1), 67-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54622/academia.v1i2.23
Mahardika, S. (2023). Trust Crisis in Public Institutions. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 17(3), 233-247.
Nasution, A., & Harun, M. (2020). Amanah dalam Kepemimpinan Islam. Jurnal Dakwah dan Kepemimpinan, 12(1), 45-58.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
Nugroho, H. (2020). Implementasi Putusan PTUN dalam Sistem Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 15(2), 112–128.
OECD. (2022). Governance Indicators: Compliance and Trust. OECD Governance Report, 5(3), 77-91.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
Raharjo, A. (2023). Political Interference in Bureaucratic Decisions. Jurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan, 14(3), 87-99.
Rahman, A., et al. (2023). Trust in Legal Institutions: A Study of Public Perception. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 16(1), 25–41.
Rahman, F. (2023). Leadership Ethics in Islamic Governance. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 18(2), 145-160.
Rahman, F., & Khalid, A. (2021). The Concept of Mas’uliyyah in Islamic Administrative Ethics. Journal of Islamic Governance, 4(3), 55–70.
Ridwan, M. (2020). Studi Kepustakaan dalam Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(3), 145-157.
Rosdiana, H., & Pratama, B. (2023). Public Governance di Indonesia: Tantangan Implementasi. Journal of Public Administration, 9(1), 45-59.
Salam, M. (2020). Justice Principles in Islamic Politics. Jurnal Siyasah, 6(2), 89-101.
Sari, D., & Prakoso, A. (2021). Law Enforcement in PTUN Decisions: Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2), 101-115.
Setiawan, B. (2021). Intervensi Politik dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(3), 233–250.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sujatmiko, T. (2022). Penguatan Peran PTUN dalam Menjaga Supremasi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 15(2), 123-134.
Suparman, R. (2021). Supervision Weakness in Regional Governments. Governance Review, 8(4), 221-233.
Wulandari, L., & Firdaus, R. (2021). Systemic Risks in Regional Governance. Asian Journal of Regional Studies, 9(4), 120-135.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
Yulianto, B. (2022). Accountability in Indonesian Administrative Law. Journal of Asian Law, 4(1), 90-102.
Yunus, M. (2021). Moral Crisis in Bureaucratic Leadership. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 10(1), 59-73.
Zarkasyi, A. (2021). Fiqh Siyasah dan Good Governance. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Islam, 7(3), 111-124.