Strengthening Intellectual Property Rights: Legal Responses to Trademark Counterfeiting in Indonesia’s E-Commerce Era

Main Article Content

Fahriza Hafiz
Rosta Hamidah

Abstract

This research examines legal protection against the unauthorized use of counterfeit trademarks in Indonesia under Constitution Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications (MIG Law). The study addresses significant challenges arising from the circulation of counterfeit goods, which causes economic losses of up to Rp 291 trillion, tax revenue losses, and employment disruptions. With the rise of e-commerce and digital platforms, counterfeiters exploit technological advancements to distribute fake products widely, complicating enforcement efforts. The research objectives include analyzing the comprehensive legal framework for trademark protection, evaluating enforcement mechanisms, and identifying effective dispute resolution routes. The study employs a qualitative approach, reviewing relevant legislation, enforcement data, and stakeholder perspectives. Key findings reveal that while the MIG Law provides a strong statutory basis, enforcement remains constrained by procedural requirements such as the necessity of owner complaints to trigger criminal proceedings. Non-litigation alternatives like mediation and arbitration offer viable dispute resolution but depend on effective implementation. Criminal enforcement is notably more effective in securing counterfeit goods than civil litigation. The study recommends legal reforms to empower authorities for proactive actions without owner complaints and the enhancement of human resource capabilities, including IP investigator training and mediator certification. In conclusion, strengthening both legal provisions and institutional capacity is essential for robust protection of registered trademarks against counterfeiting in Indonesia’s evolving digital economy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hafiz, F., & Hamidah, R. (2025). Strengthening Intellectual Property Rights: Legal Responses to Trademark Counterfeiting in Indonesia’s E-Commerce Era. Legtimacy: Journal Of Law and Islamic Law, 1(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://jurnal.erapublikasi.id/index.php/JOLIL/article/view/1503
Section
Articles

References

P. Tommy, Pelindungan Merek. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2017.

F. N. Heriani, “Tips untuk Pelaku Usaha Saat Menangani Pelanggaran Merek,” hukumonline.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/tips-untuk-pelaku-usaha-saat-menangani-pelanggaran-merek-lt61337d7c5a7f6/

R. W. Ananto, E. Amalia, and M. W. Utama, “Politik Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,” J. Sos. dan Budaya Syar-i, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1605–1616, 2022, doi: 10.15408/sjsbs.v10i5.35805.

C. Hans and C. S. T. Kansil, “Analisis Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penggunaan Merek pada Kelas Barang dan Jasa yang Sama,” UNES Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 4163–4171, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.

R. Ratna, T. Safiranita, and B. Utama, Pelanggaran Merek di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Revika Aditama, 2021.

D. Rezki and S. Astarini, Penghapusan Merek Terdaftar: Berdasarkan UU No. 15 tahun 2001 tentang merek dan UU No. 20 tahun 2016 tentang merek dan indikasi geografis jo. Perubahan UU No. 11 tahun 2020 tentang cipta kerja di hubungkan dengan TRIPs-WTO. Penerbit Alumni, 2021.

F. N. Heriani, “Minimalisir Kendala Penyelesaian Perkara, PPNS DJKI Koordiinasi Bersama Bareskrim Polri,” hukumonline.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/minimalisir-kendala-penyelesaian-perkara--ppns-djki-koordiinasi-bersama-bareskrim-polri-lt62f78f58a7280/

G. Jotyka and I. G. Ketut Riski Suputra, “Prosedur Pendaftaran Dan Pengalihan Merek Serta Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001,” Ganesha Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 125–139, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.23887/glr.v3i2.447.

D. A. Prakoso and J. neltje Sally, “Legal Protection of Famous Brands Based on Law Number 20 Of 2016 Concerning Brands and Geographical Indications,” J. Equity Law Gov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–62, 2024, doi: 10.55637/elg.4.1.9446.52-62.

S. Donandi S. and P. A. Cakranegara, “The Implementation of Well-Known Trademarks Doctrine in Indonesian Commercial and Supreme Court,” Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 159–182, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.2016.

G. P. . Tutuarima and H. Tuasikal, “Peran Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Melindungi Merek di Platform E-Commerce Indonesia,” J. Dual Leg. Syst., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 90–108, 2025, doi: 10.58824/jdls.v2i2.395.

A. Kennedy and F. X. Wartoyo, “Perlindungan Merek Dagang pada Platform E-Commerce di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif HAM,” JIPRO J. Intellect. Prop., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94–119, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss2.art1.

D. A. Narassati, M. Amirulloh, and R. R. Permata, “Perlindungan Hukum Merek Dagang Scopus terhadap Penggunaan Kemiripan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Merek Dagang dan Peraturan Pelaksanaannya,” Socius J. Penelit. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 254–263, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10539748.

I. G. K. Ariawan, “Penelitian Hukum Normatif,” Kertha Widya J. Huk., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2013.

K. Benuf and M. Azhar, “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer,” Gema Keadilan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 20–33, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.14710/gk.2020.7504.

Ardians, “Upaya Hukum Terhadap Badan Atau Perorangan Yang Menggunakan Merek Yang Telah Terdaftar,” ardiansnco.co.id. [Online]. Available: https://ardiansnco.co.id/upaya-hukum-terhadap-badan-atau-perorangan-yang-menggunakan-merek-yang-telah-terdaftar/

Y. B. Puspita, “Ganti Rugi Atas Penggunaan Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya,” Locus J. Konsep Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 134–150, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.56128/jkih.v3i3.295.

S. A. Wiraguna, “Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia,” Public Sph. J. Sos. Polit. Pemerintah. dan Huk., vol. 3, no. 3, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390.

A. A. Rishadi, “Tantangan Membasmi Pelanggaran Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital,” Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. [Online]. Available: https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/tantangan-membasmi-pelanggaran-kekayaan-intelektual-di-era-digital?kategori=

N. Muslimawati, “Peredaran Barang Palsu Rugikan Ekonomi RI hingga Rp 291 T,” kumparan.com. [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/peredaran-barang-palsu-rugikan-ekonomi-ri-hingga-rp-291-t-1xcn3xMbnX1

E. Kurniawan, “Ikhtiar Memperjuangkan Hak Cipta,” kompas.id. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/06/22/memperjuangkan-hak-cipta

N. Irawati and B. Santoso, “Pelanggaran Hak Atas Merek dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya (Studi Putusan No. 2/Pdt. Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga. Sby),” Notarius, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 2020–2037, 2024, doi: 10.14710/nts.v17i3.53253.

E. Kurniawan, “Polisi Tangkap Penjual Suplemen Palsu di Jakarta,” kompas.id. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2023/06/01/obat-palsu-dan-pidana-pemulih-kekayaan-intelektual

DJKI, “Mediasi Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Buku PPKC Berujung Damai,” Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. [Online]. Available: https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/mediasi-pelanggaran-hak-cipta-buku-ppkc-berujung-damai?kategori=Berita+Resmi+Indikasi+Geografis

DJKI, “Sepakat Berdamai, DJKI Berhasil Memediasi Sengketa Merek Longchamp,” Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. [Online]. Available: https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/sepakat-berdamai-djki-berhasil-memediasi-sengketa-merek-longchamp?kategori=Berita+Resmi+Indikasi+Geografis