A Study on Women’s Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in Egypt
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate women’s perceptions of the main reasons behind their exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) in Egypt. An online survey was conducted with a random sample of 277 respondents from Cairo and in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 women who have been subjected to IPV in addition to observation to their living conditions. According to the conversations with the interviewees, the prevalence of IPV can be explained as a means of discharge from their structural conditions and stress factors. Around 79% of the respondents relate IPV with poverty, 65% relate it with lack of economic resources, and 90% believe that education is a triggering factor for it. Only 14% are decisive in associating IPV with a certain social class. The research finds that adverse structural conditions in poor communities such as poor housing, lack of water delivery, lack of education, lack of stable income and the lack of any social or economic opportunities explains the high rate of IPV among poor people. Men’s image of themselves and their manhood is severely threatened. Such a psychological status translates into feelings of depression, anxiety, frustration, anger, and fury leading to IPV. While IPV may be pervasive, is not inevitable. Both government and civil society have a key role in reducing the risk factors and addressing the reasons behind violence against women.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abramsky, T., Watts, C., Garcia-Moreno, C., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H. a. F. M., & Heise, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-109
Al-Magdoub, A. (2003). The phenomenon of Violence in The Egyptian Family. The National Center for Criminal and Social research.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Defining the Data Challenge for Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence. ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/defining-data-challenge-family-domestic-and-sexual-violence/latest-release.
Bayat, A. (1997). Cairo's poor: Dilemmas of survival and solidarity. Middle East Report, 202, 7.
Bayat, A., & Denis, E. (2000). Who is afraid of ashwaiyyat? Urban change and politics in Egypt. Environment and Urbanization, 12(2), 185-199.
Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2003). Neighbourhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of quantitative criminology, 19(3), 207-235.
George, J., & Stith, S. M. (2014). An updated feminist view of intimate partner violence. Family Process, 53(2), 179-193.
Greenfeld, L. and Craven, D. (1998), Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends and Girlfriends, US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, Michigan, MI.
Habib, S. (2009). Egypt Violence against Women Study Summary of Findings. Egypt: National Council for Women.
Heise, L. and Gracia-Moreno, C. (2002), “Violence by intimate partners”, in Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Ziwi, A.B. and Lozano, R. (Eds), World Report on Violence and Health, WHO Press, Geneva, pp. 87-121.
Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and victims, 1(2), 101-124.
Jewkes, R. (2002), “Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention”, Violence against Women, 359 (9315), 1423-9.
Jeyaseelan, L. et al. (2004). World studies of abuse in the family environment–risk factors for physical intimate partner violence. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 11(2), 117-124.
Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social forces, 75(2), 619-648.
Menjivar, C. and Salicido, O. (2002), “Immigrant women and domestic violence: common experiences in different countries”, Gender & Society, 16 (898), pp. 898-920.
Ozer, E.J., Best, S.R., Lipsey, T.L. and Weiss, D.S. (2003), Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 129 (3), 52-73.
Pearlin, L. I. (1989). The sociological study of stress. Journal of health and social behaviour, 241-256.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American journal of sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
Spruin, E., Alleyne, E., Papadaki, L. (2015) "Domestic abuse victims’ perceptions of abuse and support: a narrative study", Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1 (1), pp.19-28.
Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology, 25(4), 893-910.
Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. J., & Tritt, D. R. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001
Ullman, S.E. (2005), “Interviewing clinicians and advocates who work with sexual assault survivors: a personal perspective on moving from quantitative to qualitative methods”, Violence Against Women, 11(9), 1113-39