Media Literacy Level and Violence Exposure Among Junior High School Students: A Pre-Post Descriptive Survey of a Social Intervention
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines media literacy levels and violence exposure among eighth-grade students prior to a socialization intervention, and describes changes in comprehension, attitude, and practical knowledge following the program. Employing a pre-post descriptive survey design, data were collected from 32 students of class VIII B at SMP Negeri 1 Mertoyudan, Magelang, before a socialization program titled 'Bijak Menonton, Bijak Bertindak' (Watch Wisely, Act Wisely), and from 31 students in a post-socialization questionnaire. Pre-socialization findings revealed that 93.8% of students owned personal smartphones, 59.4% used them for three or more hours daily, and TikTok was the dominant platform. While 56.3% encountered violent or negative content at least occasionally, only 21.9% formally identified themselves as violence victims and despite behaviourally reported victimization rates being substantially higher. Media literacy was limited where only 43.8% of students reported knowing appropriate digital response steps. Following the socialization, which used the KPH (Kenali–Pahami–Hindari) framework with animated video, structured presentation, and a gamified quiz, it showed over 90% of students recognized victimization signs, over 85% knew appropriate responses to negative social media content, and the majority reported increased caution in interpersonal and online conduct. These findings highlight the persistent gap between violence experience and recognition, and demonstrate that interactive, framework-based media literacy socialization can meaningfully improve adolescent violence literacy in a single session.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alava, S., Frau-Meigs, D., & Hassan, G. (2017). YOUTH AND VIOLENT EXTREMISM ON SOCIAL MEDIA: MAPPING THE RESEARCH With the collaboration of Hasna Hussein and Yuanyuan Wei. http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en
Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Loureiro, Y. K., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326987
Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2024). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media and Society, 26(2), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
Coelho, P. M. F., Correia, P. P., & Medina, I. G. (2017). Social Media: A New Way of Public and Political Communication in Digital Media. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 11(6), 150. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i6.6876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i6.6876
Creswell, Jhon. W. (2014). Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches-SAGE Publications (2013).pdf (p. 285). https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Denzin, K. N., & Lincoln, S. Y. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd Edition). Qualitative Research, 9(3), 388–389.
Dookhoo, S. R. (2015). HOW MILLENNIALS ENGAGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVISM: A USES AND GRATIFICATIONS APPROACH. http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0005941/SDookhoo_Thesis_Final_Submission.pdf
Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00531
Firth, E., & Marinelli, A. (2025). Datacasting: TikTok’s Algorithmic Flow as Televisual Experience. Media and Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9392
Hoff, K. E., Reese-Weber, M., Joel Schneider, W., & Stagg, J. W. (2009). The association between high status positions and aggressive behavior in early adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 395–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.003
Kantar. (2020). The Power of TikTok Why TikTok ? TikTok ’ s impressive splash.
Kanz, K. M. (2016). Mediated and moderated effects of violent media consumption on youth violence. European Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815608882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815608882
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2018.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Livingston, J. A., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Measurement Of The Bystander Intervention Model For Bullying And Sexual Harassment. Journal of Adolescence, 37(4), 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003
Nugroho, B. H. (2025). Digital activism and youth participation in Indonesia: A qualitative study of social media’s role in contemporary social movements. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(10), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.55942/PSSJ.V5I10.603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i10.603
Oxstrand, B., Fogelberg, K., & Lindström, B. (2009). MEDIA LITERACY EDUCATION.
Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
Simaremare, M., & Pribadi, F. (2022). Gender Violence in Virtual Sexual Harassment on Social Media Telegram. Metafora: Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal, 6(2), 2407–1757.
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., & Pang, N. (2016). Social media, political expression, and participation in Confucian Asia. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1143378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1143378
Trifecta. (2015). Generation Z Media Consumption Habits True Digital Natives. http://trifectaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Generation-Z-Sample-Trifecta-Research-Deliverable.pdf
Troop-Gordon, W. (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence: The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context. Journal of Adolescence, 55, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.012
Vermeire, L., & Van den Broeck, W. (2024). Digital Futures: A Signal-Based Approach to Inclusive Digital Youth Work for Socially Vulnerable Youth. Media and Communication, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8160
Yildiz, M. N. (2019). History of Media Literacy. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy (pp. 1–9). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0084
Zych, I., Kaakinen, M., Savolainen, I., Sirola, A., Paek, H. J., & Oksanen, A. (2023). The role of impulsivity, social relations online and offline, and compulsive Internet use in cyberaggression: A four-country study. New Media and Society, 25(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009459