The Influence of Teacher Readiness and Perceived Ease of Use of Artificial Intelligence on the Effectiveness of Digital Learning in Secondary Schools
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the influence of teacher readiness and perceived ease of use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the effectiveness of digital learning in secondary schools. The research addresses the growing need to optimize AI integration in education by focusing on human and technological factors that determine successful implementation. The objective of this study is to analyze the individual and simultaneous effects of teacher readiness and perceived ease of use on digital learning effectiveness. A quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design was employed. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed to 198 secondary school teachers who have experience with digital learning technologies. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed hypotheses. The results reveal that teacher readiness has a positive and significant effect on digital learning effectiveness, indicating that teachers’ competence, confidence, and preparedness play a crucial role in enhancing instructional quality. Similarly, perceived ease of use significantly influences digital learning effectiveness, suggesting that user-friendly AI systems facilitate greater adoption and utilization in teaching practices. Furthermore, the combined effect of both variables demonstrates strong explanatory power, confirming that the integration of competent teachers and accessible technology leads to improved learning outcomes. The study also found an increase in digital learning effectiveness, particularly in student engagement and personalized learning. These findings highlight the importance of continuous professional development, user-centered technology design, and institutional support to maximize the benefits of AI in education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2023). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00345-2
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2023). Effective teacher professional development: New insights and evidence. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231154321
Esteve-Mon, F. M., Llopis-Nebot, M. Á., & Adell-Segura, J. (2024). Digital competence and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. Computers & Education, 198, 104742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104742
Falloon, G. (2023). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10115-4
Fteiha, M., & Awwad, N. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption in education: A usability and acceptance perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1123–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12011-3
Fullan, M. (2023). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Granström, H., Humble, N., & Hansson, P. (2025). Teachers’ readiness for AI integration in education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1622240. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1622240
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Harsanti, A. G., Widodo, A., & Suryani, N. (2025). Barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in developing countries’ education systems. Education Sciences, 15(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020145
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Testing measurement invariance in PLS-SEM. International Marketing Review, 39(3), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2021-0281
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Iddrisu, I., Olumide, O., & Abdulrahman, A. (2025). Teacher readiness and AI adoption in secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102344
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kashif, M., Ahmad, S., & Tanveer, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100198
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Park, M. (2025). Teachers’ digital competence and AI integration in classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 55–68.
Lin, X. (2025). Extending the technology acceptance model for AI adoption in education. Sustainability, 17(8), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083698
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Mediodia, J. (2025). AI-driven digital pedagogy: Transforming classroom practices. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 53(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395251345678
Mukama, E. (2023). Institutional factors influencing technology adoption in schools. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100256
Ngongpah, F., & Oni, S. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of AI in education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 11(1), 45–60.
OECD. (2023). Shaping the future of education with AI. OECD Publishing.
Puri, V., Mishra, S., & Singh, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence and learning effectiveness: Empirical evidence from secondary education. Computers & Education, 210, 104999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.104999
Redecker, C. (2022). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Journal of Education, 57(1), 12–25.
Reyes-Rojas, G., Torres-Díaz, J. C., & Infante-Moro, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in secondary education: Impact on learning outcomes. Research in Learning Technology, 33, 3448.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2023). The technology acceptance model in education: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09721-9
Selwyn, N. (2022). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Tan, S. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence and personalized learning in schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10234-5
Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2022). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of technology. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(4), 453–463.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2022). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and future directions. MIS Quarterly, 46(1), 328–376.
Yao, J., & Wang, X. (2024). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to adopt AI in education. Computers & Education, 194, 104709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104709
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bond, M., Marin, V. I., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27.