Symbolic Representations of Social Criticism in Us (2019)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The evolution of media, particularly electronic and audio-visual media such as film, has provided an effective platform for conveying social criticism implicitly through symbolic elements. This research attempts to examine the social criticism signs in the Us (2019) film, by using Roland Barthes's semiotics theory and the concept of social criticism by David Harvey as the theoretical framework. The research method that used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The writer found there were four objects which become social criticism signs that the writer gets based on several objects that were attached to the Tethered throughout this film. The four objects are scissors, bunker, rabbit and the red color. In the analysis, the connotative signs of the four objects have an important role for understanding what forms of social criticism that experienced by the Tethered in this film. Scissors which have a connotative sign "get a freedom", is a symbol of social criticism regarding social oppression. Bunker which has a connotative sign "significant gap between upper-class and lower-class", is a symbol of social criticism regarding social and economic inequality. Rabbit which has a connotative sign "undervalued", is a symbol of social criticism regarding social discrimination. Red color which has a connotative sign "resistance", is a symbol of social criticism regarding resistance to social injustice. Based on the explanation, it can be concluded that these four signs have an important role to understand the social criticism that related to capitalism ideology in this film. This research contributes to the understanding of how films can serve as potent vehicles for social criticism by decoding implicit signs that symbolize complex socio-economic issues.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Cultural Narratives agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA.4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Ahmadgoli, K., & Yazdanjoo, M. (2019). Multimodal representation of social discourses in Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation: a social semiotic study. Social Semiotics, 30(5), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1629568
Akbar, A. Z. (2016). Kritik Sosial, Pers Dan Politik Indonesia. Journal Universitas Islam Indonesia.Volume 17. (pp. 44-51). DOI: 10.20885/unisia.v0i32.5857.
Al-Abbas, M. B. M., Al-Atoum, M. S., Alsaggar, M. A., & Abu-Hammad, R. M. (2024). Aesthetics and Semiotics of Communication in Visual Language: a multimodal criticism on the short film of Ismail. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 570–577. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.30
Allen, G. (2004). Roland Barthes. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634424
Barthes, Roland. (1994). The Semiotic Challenge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Bertens, Hans. (2002). Literary Theory: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Dianiya, V. (2020). REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL CLASS IN FILM (Semiotic analysis of Roland Barthes Film Parasite). Profetik Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v13i2.1946
Domhoff, G. W. (2009). Who Rules America? Challenges to corporate and class dominance. McGraw-Hill. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA91016608
Fonseca, J. D., Ferreira, H. M., Da Silva, M. C., & Lima, I. V. (2023). The animation “Purl”: an analysis from the perspective of Sociointeractional Semiotics. Texto Livre Linguagem E Tecnologia, 16. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.45482
Hadi, I., & Saputri, N. L. (2020). Representation of social criticism in the documentary film Netflix: Miss Americana. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 3(3), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4314354
Harvey, David. (2008). The Manifesto of Communist Party. London: Pluto Press.
Harvey, David. (2014). Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
Hirvonen, O. (2019). Grounding social criticism: from understanding to suffering and back. Digithum, 1(23), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i23.3160
Klandermans, B., & Van Stekelenburg, J. (2013). Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0024
McFee, G. (2011). The philosophical aesthetics of dance: identity, performance and understanding. Dance Books. http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/9275/
Ristiasari, R., & Kaprisma, H. (2021). SOCIAL CRITICISM IN THE MISTER FRIMEN ANIMATED SERIES. Capture Jurnal Seni Media Rekam, 12(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.33153/capture.v12i2.3255
Rutsyamsun, V., & Sakinah, R. M. N. (2023). A Semiotic analysis of social criticism in Robert Zemeckis’s Forrest Gump Movie (1994). JETLEE Journal of English Language Teaching Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.47766/jetlee.v3i1.1069
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. Allen Lane. http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/es41/es41-stiglitz.pdf
Virginás, A. (2020). Electronic Screens in Film Diegesis: modality modes and qualifying aspects of a formation enhanced by the post-digital era. In Springer eBooks (pp. 141–173). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49679-1_4